‘Rationalized incrementalism’. How behavior experts in government negotiate institutional logics
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
How Individuals Negotiate Societies
In this paper we propose a formal model of coordination in Multi-Agent Systems. Wooldridge and Jennings [15] restrict their approach to Cooperative Problem Solving cases insisting in a team-formation stage in which agents commit themselves to act as a group to achieve a common goal before negotiation starts. In our model, autonomous agents first recognise how they depend on each other (they may...
متن کاملAnalyzing the Informal Institutional Restraint in Government Behavior
The most important factor of government behavior is the conduct of government functionary. It fully demonstrates the law enforcement and personnel management by the officeholders. The ultimate aim of the government reform is to maximize the operating efficiency at the smallest economic cost. A systematic structure is to be set up by re-combing and integrating government management, adjusting an...
متن کاملBe Prepared: How US Government Experts Think About Cybersecurity
Online security experiences, perceptions, and behaviors are key to understanding users security practices. Users express that they are concerned about online security, but they also express frustration in navigating the often confusing and mentally taxing cybersecurity world. This paper examines the differences in cybersecurity perception and behavior between cybersecurity experts in the US Gov...
متن کاملHow Experts Explain Strategic Behavior During Real-Time Strategy Games
Real-time strategy games, such as Wargus, are examples of complex learning and planning domains that present unique challenges to AI and machine learning. These games usually comprise a large number of states, actions, resources, and decisions that a player needs to take into consideration, while, at the same time, the current game situation is influenced and modified by opponents. With the dri...
متن کاملVisualizing Institutional Logics in Sociomaterial Practices
Article history: Received 17 November 2013 Received in revised form 25 May 2014 Accepted 25 May 2014 Available online xxxx This paper aims to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the mutual constitution of competing institutional logics and sociomaterial entanglements by combining a sociomaterial lens with the institutional logics perspective. We present findings from an interp...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Critical Policy Studies
سال: 2018
ISSN: 1946-0171,1946-018X
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2018.1557067